THEORIES OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM


VIEW WEEKLY CLASS SYNOPSIS HERE:

SYNOPSIS 1
http://www.slideshare.net/yassyed31/synopsis-1a

http://www.slideshare.net/yassyed31/synopsis-1-b

SYNOPSIS 2
http://www.slideshare.net/yassyed31/synopsis-2a

http://www.slideshare.net/yassyed31/ynsynopsis-2

SYNOPSIS 3
http://www.slideshare.net/yassyed31/synopsis-3-50550155

http://www.slideshare.net/yassyed31/synopsis-3b

SYNOPSIS 4
http://www.slideshare.net/yassyed31/synopsis-no4a

http://www.slideshare.net/yassyed31/synopsis-4b

SUBJECT INTRODUCTION:

The subject offers a thematic inquiry into architectural theory in the broader context of philosophical schools of thought and cultural and social conditions, which include modernism, postmodernism, phenomenology, semiotics, post-structuralism, and deconstruction. These themes will guide the organization of weekly lecture and discussions, which will proceed from the establishment of a basic theoretical apparatus to the examination of specific cases. These will supply us with tools for the analysis of specific architectural situations. Students will develop a written synopsis of a designated reading, and an in-depth and analytical research paper on the designated topic.


Abstract
“What is one doing when one is doing architecture?” (Simon Unwin, 2014)
Theorize – to think of or suggest ideas about what is possibly true or real; to form or suggest a theory about something; speculate / To propose as a theory
This project attempts to convey an understanding of architect’s architectural theory through a direct observation and analysis of his/her buildings. Using architecture as primary text, this project claims that the world of form is not arbitrary but displays an internal logic that has the capacity to convey meaning. Analytical illustrations are used extensively to reveal the conceptual and experiential order of the architecture.It will support students’ learning since doing architecture can be developed by studying the work of others.
Learning Outcomes
1.Analyse architecture and urban forms in relation to relevant architectural theories
2.Analyse and critique the relationship between architecture and its social, cultural and intellectual context
3.Produce, orally and in writing, a critical interpretation of architecture and urbanism in relation to relevant theories within the contemporary discourse of architecture
Brief
This project comprises of 2 parts:
• PROJECT PART I: ANALYSING SELF (30%)
• PROJECT PART II: ANALYZING AND THEORIZING


PROJECT PART I: Analysing “Through the eyes” of an architect/urban designer/ theoretician (30%)
Part 1: This project asks you to select a defined area of your hometown and see it “through the eyes” of one architect, urban designer or theoretician that was discussed in the lecture series. You are asked to apply or translate design theories and historic urban design approaches onto this area. Imagine how the architect or urban designer may have analysed and interpreted in this chosen area.
The application or translation should primarily happen through a graphical language or sketch design. Select a medium and style that is appropriate for the chosen architect or urban designer. This should be accompanied by short reflective text of ca 500 words.
TASK:
Stage 1: Choosing the area for analysis (Students can choose to work in a group of 3) (10%)
a) Choosing one architect, urban designer or theoretician
b) Relevant drawing
c) List of references
Stage 2: Analysis and Interpretation (Individual) (20%)
a) Sketches/Drawing
b) Reflective text

PROJECT PART II: ANALYZING AND THEORIZING ARCHITECTURE (30%)
Part 2 of the project emphasises architecture is like language with vocabulary, grammatical structure; both physical and intellectual. Through certain arrangement, it carries messages and communicates meanings. Nevertheless, in order to understand architecture, one must be aware of the conditions within which they are employed.
TASK:
Stage 3: Analysing and theorizing architecture (Individual) (30%)
You are to select a particular building within the area. You are to studied on impact of external factors on architecture (emphasize on how the architect had responded to the factors in realizing their theoretical intention)
a) External contributing factors (min 3)
b) Analysis diagrams (plan, section, elevation)
c) To theorize architecture based on analysis of self & architecture

PROJECT 1 ANALYZING SELF:
PROJECT STUDY CAN BE VIEWED HERE:

GROUP:
http://www.slideshare.net/yassyed31/project-1-atheorizingarchitecture


INDIVIDUAL:
http://www.slideshare.net/yassyed31/project-1-indi



PROJECT 2 CAN BE VIEWED HERE:
http://www.slideshare.net/yassyed31/final-theories-2-essay

DIAGRAMS FOR PROJECT 2:





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SHAPE GRAMMAR

MEASURED DRAWINGS-KUALA LUMPUR TEXTILE MUSEUM

ISLAMIC ARCHITECTURE